| 7354 |
31 |
FeS2 NPs |
200 |
|
nm |
TEM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7481 |
198 |
CuS |
180 |
|
nm |
SEM |
the morphology of CuS is hexahedrons with the size range of 118–238 nm and with an average size of 180 nm (Fig. S1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7527 |
269 |
CMS NPs |
12 |
|
nm |
AFM |
thickness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7528 |
269 |
CMS NPs |
28 |
|
nm |
TEM |
average size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7536 |
289 |
WS2 |
50-300 |
|
nm |
TEM |
As shown in Fig. 1a, the WS2 nanosheets exhibit wrinkled sheets due to partial overlap and folding, and the diameter range of layer is determined as 50-300 nm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7606 |
367 |
Porous regular hexagonal-shaped FeS2 nanosheets (NSs) |
1 |
|
μm |
SEM |
SEM and TEM images of the FeS2 NSs (Fig. s2A and B) revealed that regular hexagonal-shaped nanosheets (2D) were synthesized with a side length of about 1 μm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7612 |
376 |
ND nanozymes |
112.31 |
24.07 |
nm |
TEM |
Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images of as-prepared ND nanozymes clearly revealed a uniform spherical morphology with an average diameter of 112.31 ± 24.07 nm (Figures 1B, 1C, and 1E). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7628 |
391 |
CuS HNSs. |
200 |
|
nm |
TEM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7657 |
425 |
AgBiS2 |
330 |
|
nm |
TEM |
The diameter and the shell thickness of AgBiS2 were ∼330 nm and ∼35 nm, which were determined by Nano Measurer from the TEM images (Figure 1D), respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7701 |
468 |
Ag2-xCuxS NPs |
3,1 |
|
nm |
TEM |
The average size of the Ag1.8Cu0.2S NPs calculated from corresponding TEM image is ∼3.1 nm (Fig. 1c). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7723 |
497 |
CuS NPs |
6 |
|
nm |
DLS |
Based on statistical analysis (Fig. S2†), the average size of the CuS NPs was ca. 6 nm in diameter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7772 |
544 |
CuCo2S4 NPs |
30 |
|
nm |
TEM |
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7773 |
544 |
CuCo2S4 NPs |
68 |
|
nm |
DLS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7859 |
639 |
WS2 QDs |
11.25 |
1.22 |
nm |
TEM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7868 |
651 |
FeS2/SiO2 |
70 |
|
nm |
TEM |
Averange |
210.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7870 |
654 |
FeS2/SiO2 |
70 |
|
nm |
TEM |
Averange |
210.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7887 |
670 |
Fe3S4 |
|
|
nm |
SEM |
SEM was employed to investigate the effects of EG: H2O ratios on the size and shape of Fe3S4 products. All samples exhibited flower-like structure consisting of multiple nanosheets (Fig. S1). However, the “flower” size decreased from ∼10 to ∼4 μm with increasing EG concentrations from 0 to 100%, which may be ascribed to differences in the dielectric constant, interionic attraction and solute-solvent interactions on crystal growth formation [33]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7889 |
672 |
MoS2-Lys NSs |
80-110 |
|
nm |
TEM |
The diameter of MoS2-Lys NSs was in the range of 80–110 nm, which was much smaller than that of the H2SO4-treated MoS2 NSs with a diameter of 150–210 nm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7894 |
677 |
HyPEI-supported ZnS NC |
10 |
|
nm |
TEM |
The high-magnification FE (field-emission)-TEM micrograph in Figure 1a (inset) reveals spherical particles with an average size under 10 nm. The low-magnification TEM micrograph in Figure 1b shows the presence of both ~10 and ~50 nm aggregated particles in a solution of ZnS/HyPEI that was kept at room temperature for 14 days. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7901 |
687 |
CuSNPs |
5.1 |
0.5 |
nm |
TEM |
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image of the CuSNPs reveals a spherical morphology (Fig. 2B) with an average diameter of around 5.1 ± 0.5 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8043 |
847 |
MoS2 NSs |
2.5 |
0.5 |
μm |
DLS |
Bulk MoS2 is approximately ~2–3 µm, which is in agreement with the size provided by Sigma-Aldrich. After the probe sonication for 3 h, the size of B1-MoS2 NSs was dramatically reduced to 235 ± 5 nm. Similarly, the size of B2-MoS2 NSs and B3-MoS2 NSs were reduced to 189 ± 6 nm and 185 ± 5 nm, respectively, as shown in Figure 3A. However, the size of the residual content R1-MoS2 and R2-MoS2 were 850 ± 70 nm and 535 ± 10 nm, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8118 |
1056 |
WS2 nanosheets |
|
|
|
TEM&AFM |
The morphological characteristics of the exfoliated WS2 nanosheets were observed by TEM (Figure 1a). The WS2 nanosheets display a wrinkle shape due to partial overlap and folding, and the diameter of the layered nanosheets ranges from 50 to 300 nm. The AFM image in Figure 1b further proves the above-mentioned morphology and size of layered nanosheets, indicating that the thickness of the WS2 nanosheets is about 13 nm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8143 |
1077 |
WS2 nanosheets |
100 |
|
nm |
AFM |
10 nm thickness； The nanoparticle and zeta potential analyzer was used to measure the lateral average size and zeta potential of the WS2 nanosheets as 122.9 nm and −2.73 mV, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8314 |
1305 |
MoS2 |
100 |
|
nm |
TEM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8406 |
1396 |
MoS2 |
200 |
|
nm |
AFM |
The size distributions extracted from the AFM measurements reveal that the nanosheets are ≈200 nm in length while the average thickness is ≤1 nm, consistent with single layer nanosheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8433 |
1428 |
WBLCS |
500 |
|
nm |
SEM |
the product has a spherical structure with a diameter of about 500 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8438 |
1433 |
CuS |
15 |
|
nm |
TEM |
The average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|